PIRSA:10120058

The complementary contributions of free will, indeterminism and signalling to models of quantum correlations

APA

Hall, M. (2010). The complementary contributions of free will, indeterminism and signalling to models of quantum correlations. Perimeter Institute. https://pirsa.org/10120058

MLA

Hall, Michael. The complementary contributions of free will, indeterminism and signalling to models of quantum correlations. Perimeter Institute, Dec. 02, 2010, https://pirsa.org/10120058

BibTex

          @misc{ pirsa_PIRSA:10120058,
            doi = {10.48660/10120058},
            url = {https://pirsa.org/10120058},
            author = {Hall, Michael},
            keywords = {Quantum Foundations},
            language = {en},
            title = {The complementary contributions of free will, indeterminism and signalling to models of quantum correlations},
            publisher = {Perimeter Institute},
            year = {2010},
            month = {dec},
            note = {PIRSA:10120058 see, \url{https://pirsa.org}}
          }
          

Michael Hall Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB)

Abstract

To model statistical correlations that violate Bell inequalities (such as singlet state correlations), one must relax at least one of three physically plausible postulates: measurement independence (experimenters can freely choose measurement settings independently of any underlying variables describing the system); no-signalling (underlying marginal distributions for one observer cannot depend on the measurement setting of a distant observer), and determinism (all outcomes can be fully determined by the values of underlying variables). It will be shown that, for any given model, one may quantify the degrees of measurement dependence, signalling and indeterminism, by three numbers M, S and I. It will further be shown how the Bell-CHSH inequality may be generalised to a "relaxed" Bell inequality, of the form ++-<=B(I,S,M), where the upper bound is tight and ranges between 2 and 4. The usual Bell-CHSH inequality corresponds to I=S=M=0. More generally, the bound B(I,S,M) quantifies the necessary mutual tradeoff between I, S and M that is required to model a given violation of the Bell-CHSH inequality. Some information-theoretic implications will be briefly described, as well as a no-signalling deterministic model of the singlet state that allows up to 86% experimental free will.