PIRSA:19040084

Epistemic interpretations of quantum mechanics have a measurement problem

APA

Ruebeck, J. (2019). Epistemic interpretations of quantum mechanics have a measurement problem. Perimeter Institute. https://pirsa.org/19040084

MLA

Ruebeck, Joshua. Epistemic interpretations of quantum mechanics have a measurement problem. Perimeter Institute, Apr. 09, 2019, https://pirsa.org/19040084

BibTex

          @misc{ pirsa_PIRSA:19040084,
            doi = {10.48660/19040084},
            url = {https://pirsa.org/19040084},
            author = {Ruebeck, Joshua},
            keywords = {Quantum Foundations},
            language = {en},
            title = {Epistemic interpretations of quantum mechanics have a measurement problem},
            publisher = {Perimeter Institute},
            year = {2019},
            month = {apr},
            note = {PIRSA:19040084 see, \url{https://pirsa.org}}
          }
          

Joshua Ruebeck Institute for Quantum Computing (IQC)

Abstract

Epistemic interpretations of quantum theory maintain that quantum states only represent incomplete information about the physical states of the world. A major motivation for this view is the promise to provide a reasonable account of state update under measurement by asserting that it is simply a natural feature of updating incomplete statistical information. Here we demonstrate that all known epistemic ontological models of quantum theory in dimension d ≥ 3, including those designed to evade the conclusion of the PBR theorem, cannot represent state update correctly. Conversely, interpretations for which the wavefunction is real evade such restrictions despite remaining subject to long-standing criticism regarding physical discontinuity, indeterminism and the ambiguity of the Heisenberg cut. This revives the possibility of a no-go theorem with no additional assumptions, and demonstrates that what is usually thought of as a strength of epistemic interpretations may in fact be a weakness. We also discuss hidden Markov models and their relationship to ontological models, demarcating the ways in which one might move ‘outside’ the ontological models formalism.