Was Spacetime a Glorious Historical Accident?
APA
Barbour, J. (2008). Was Spacetime a Glorious Historical Accident?. Perimeter Institute. https://pirsa.org/08100040
MLA
Barbour, Julian. Was Spacetime a Glorious Historical Accident?. Perimeter Institute, Oct. 01, 2008, https://pirsa.org/08100040
BibTex
@misc{ pirsa_PIRSA:08100040, doi = {10.48660/08100040}, url = {https://pirsa.org/08100040}, author = {Barbour, Julian}, keywords = {}, language = {en}, title = {Was Spacetime a Glorious Historical Accident?}, publisher = {Perimeter Institute}, year = {2008}, month = {oct}, note = {PIRSA:08100040 see, \url{https://pirsa.org}} }
University of Oxford
Collection
Talk Type
Abstract
Exactly half a century after Minkowski’s justly famous lecture, Dirac’s efforts to quantize gravity led him “to doubt how fundamental the four-dimensional requirement in physics is”. Dirac does not appear to have explored this doubt further, but I shall argue that it needs to be considered seriously. The fact is that Einstein and Minkowski fused space and time into a four-dimensional continuum but never directly posed the two most fundamental questions in dynamics: What is time? What is motion? It was an historical accident that Einstein attempted to implement Mach’s principle after he had created special relativity; otherwise he would have been forced to address these questions, which have never been properly considered. I shall show how they can be answered and suggest that: 1) time and space are utterly different; 2) the dynamical law of the universe may define absolute simultaneity in a manner that is still consistent with local validity of Minkowski’s marvellous notion of spacetime.