On the reality of time and the evolution of laws


Smolin, L. (2008). On the reality of time and the evolution of laws. Perimeter Institute. https://pirsa.org/08100049


Smolin, Lee. On the reality of time and the evolution of laws. Perimeter Institute, Oct. 02, 2008, https://pirsa.org/08100049


          @misc{ pirsa_PIRSA:08100049,
            doi = {10.48660/08100049},
            url = {https://pirsa.org/08100049},
            author = {Smolin, Lee},
            keywords = {Quantum Foundations},
            language = {en},
            title = {On the reality of time and the evolution of laws},
            publisher = {Perimeter Institute},
            year = {2008},
            month = {oct},
            note = {PIRSA:08100049 see, \url{https://pirsa.org}}

Lee Smolin Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics


There are a number of arguments in the philosophical, physical and cosmological literatures for the thesis that time is not fundamental to the description of nature. According to this view, time should be only an approximate notion which emerges from a more fundamental, timeless description only in certain limiting approximations. My first task is to review these arguments and explain why they fail. I will then examine the opposite view, which is that time and change are fundamental and, indeed, are perhaps the only aspects of reality that are not emergent from a more fundamental, microscopic description. The argument involves several aspects of contemporary physics and cosmology including 1) the problem of the landscape of string theory, 2) cosmological inflation and the problem of initial conditions, 3) the interpretation of the “wavefunction of the universe,” and the problem of what is an observable in classical and quantum general relativity. It also involves issues in the foundations of mathematics and the issue of the proper understanding of the role of mathematics in physics. The view that time is real and not emergent is, I will argue, supported by considerations arising from all these issues It leads finally to a need for a notion of law in cosmology which replaces the freedom to choose initial conditions with a notion of laws evolving in time. The arguments presented here have been developed in collaboration with Roberto Mangabeira Unger .