Features of Sequential Weak Measurements
APA
(2016). Features of Sequential Weak Measurements. Perimeter Institute. https://pirsa.org/16060053
MLA
Features of Sequential Weak Measurements. Perimeter Institute, Jun. 22, 2016, https://pirsa.org/16060053
BibTex
@misc{ pirsa_PIRSA:16060053, doi = {10.48660/16060053}, url = {https://pirsa.org/16060053}, author = {}, keywords = {Quantum Foundations}, language = {en}, title = {Features of Sequential Weak Measurements}, publisher = {Perimeter Institute}, year = {2016}, month = {jun}, note = {PIRSA:16060053 see, \url{https://pirsa.org}} }
Collection
Talk Type
Subject
Abstract
I discuss the outcome statistics of sequential weak measurement of general observables.
In sequential weak measurement of canonical variables, without post-selection, correlations yield the corresponding correlations of the Wigner function.
Outcome correlations in spin-1/2 sequential weak measurements without post-selection coincide with those in strong measurements, they are constrained kinematically so that they yield as much information as single measurements. In sequential weak measurements with post-selection, a new anomaly occurs, different from the weak value anomaly in single weak measurements. I consider trivial post-selection, i.e.:
re-selection |f>=|i>,
which should intuitively not differ from no post-selection since weak measurements are considered non-invasive. Indeed, re-selection does not matter, compared with no-selection, for single weak measurement. It does so, however, for sequential ones. I illustrate it in spin-1/2 weak measurement.