Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitiät München (LMU)

## Talks by Erik Curiel

## Interaction and Evolution in Classical and Quantum Physics, and Indefinite Causal Structure

Erik Curiel
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitiät München (LMU)

In classical mechanics, the representations of dynamical evolutions of a system and those of interactions the system can have with its environment are different vector fields on the space of states: evolutions and interactions are conceptually, physically and mathematically different in classical physics, and those differences arise from the generic structure of the very dynamics of classical systems ("Newton's Second Law"). Correlatively, there is a clean separation of the system's degrees of freedom from those of its environment, in a sense one can make precise.

## A Weyl-Type Theorem in Geometrized Newtonian Gravity, and How It May Bear on Shape Dynamics

Erik Curiel
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitiät München (LMU)

The Weyl Theorem states that the conformal structure and the projective structure jointly suffice to fix the metric up to a global constant. This is a powerful interpretive tool in general relativity: it says in effect that if I know the paths of light rays in vacuo and I know the images of the paths of freely falling particles (i.e., the spacetime curves they follow with no preferred parametrization), then I know the metric.

## QF Meeting - Erik Curiel

Erik Curiel
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitiät München (LMU)

## There Is No Gravitational Stress-Energy Tensor

Erik Curiel
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitiät München (LMU)

The question of the existence of gravitational stress-energy in general relativity has exercised investigators in the field since the very inception of the theory. Folklore has it that no adequate definition of a localized gravitational stress-energetic quantity can be given. Most arguments to that effect invoke one version or another of the Principle of Equivalence. I argue that not only are such arguments of necessity vague and hand-waving but, worse, are beside the point and do not address the heart of the issue.