# Do black holes create polyamory

### APA

Oppenheim, J. (2015). Do black holes create polyamory. Perimeter Institute. https://pirsa.org/15080063

### MLA

Oppenheim, Jonathan. Do black holes create polyamory. Perimeter Institute, Aug. 17, 2015, https://pirsa.org/15080063

### BibTex

@misc{ pirsa_PIRSA:15080063, doi = {10.48660/15080063}, url = {https://pirsa.org/15080063}, author = {Oppenheim, Jonathan}, keywords = {Quantum Fields and Strings, Quantum Gravity, Quantum Information}, language = {en}, title = {Do black holes create polyamory}, publisher = {Perimeter Institute}, year = {2015}, month = {aug}, note = {PIRSA:15080063 see, \url{https://pirsa.org}} }

University College London

**Collection**

Talk Type

Abstract

Of course not, but if one believes that information cannot be destroyed in a theory of quantum gravity, then we run into apparent contradictions with quantum theory when we consider evaporating black holes. Namely that the no-cloning theorem or the principle of entanglement monogamy is violated. Here, we show that neither violation need hold, since, in arguing that black holes lead to cloning or non-monogamy, one needs to assume a tensor product structure between two points in space-time that could instead be viewed as causally connected. In the latter case, one is violating the semi-classical causal structure of space, which is a strictly weaker implication than cloning or non-monogamy. We show that the lack of monogamy that can emerge in evaporating space times is one that is allowed in quantum mechanics, and is very naturally related to a lack of monogamy of correlations of outputs of measurements performed at subsequent instances of time of a single system. A particular example of this is the Horowitz-Maldacena proposal, and we argue that it needn't lead to cloning or violations of entanglement monogamy. In the case of the AMPS firewall experiment we find that the entanglement structure is modified, and one must have entanglement between the infalling Hawking partners and early time outgoing Hawking radiation which surprisingly tame violation of entanglement monogamy. http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.07133