Resumming late time divergences and comparing thermal vs dS
APA
Leblond, L. (2010). Resumming late time divergences and comparing thermal vs dS. Perimeter Institute. https://pirsa.org/10100089
MLA
Leblond, Louis. Resumming late time divergences and comparing thermal vs dS. Perimeter Institute, Oct. 27, 2010, https://pirsa.org/10100089
BibTex
@misc{ pirsa_PIRSA:10100089, doi = {10.48660/10100089}, url = {https://pirsa.org/10100089}, author = {Leblond, Louis}, keywords = {Cosmology}, language = {en}, title = {Resumming late time divergences and comparing thermal vs dS}, publisher = {Perimeter Institute}, year = {2010}, month = {oct}, note = {PIRSA:10100089 see, \url{https://pirsa.org}} }
Pennsylvania State University
Talk Type
Subject
Abstract
I will argue that the dynamical renormalization group can be used to resum late time divergences appearing in loop computations in de Sitter. In the case of a scalar field with quartic interactions, the resummed propagator is the massive one. Standard mean field theory techniques can then be used to estimate the mass. This is analogous to the thermal field theory story but with some notable differences. We discuss whether a critical point can exist in dS where mean field methods fail.