Entanglement can be made robust [Joint work with Aram Harrow]

The accumulated intuition from the last decades of research on quantum entanglement is that this phenomenon is highly non-robust, and very hard to maintain in the presence of de-cohering noise at non-zero temperatures. In recent years however, and motivated, in part, by a quest for a quantum analog of the PCP theorem researches have tried to establish, at least in theory, whether or not we can preserve quantum entanglement at "constant" temperatures that are independent of system size. This would imply that any quantum state with energy at most, say 0.05 of the total available energy of the Hamiltonian, would be highly-entangled.

A conjecture formalizing this notion was defined by Freedman and Hastings : called NLTS - it stipulates the existence of locally-defined quantum systems that retain long-range entanglement even at high temperatures. Such a conjecture does not only present a necessary condition for quantum PCP, but also poses a fundamental question on the nature of entanglement itself. To this date, no such systems were found, and moreover, it became evident that even embedding local Hamiltonians on robust, albeit "non-physical" topologies, namely expanders, does not guarantee entanglement robustness.

In this study, refute the intuition that entanglement is inherently fragile: we show that locally-defined quantum systems can, in fact, retain long-range entanglement at high temperatures.  To do this, we construct an explicit family of 7-local Hamiltonians, and prove that for such local Hamiltonians ANY low-energy state is hard to even approximately simulate by low-depth quantum circuits of depth o(log(n)). In particular, this resolves the NLTS conjecture in the affirmative, and suggests the existence of quantum systems whose low-energy states are not only highly-entangled but also "usefully"-entangled, in the computational-theoretic sense.