University of Oxford
Talks by Julian Barbour
Shape Dynamics: Perspectives and Problems
Julian Barbour
University of Oxford
Shape Dynamics(SD) can be derived from principles that differ in significant respects from Einstein's derivation of GR. It requires a spatially closed universe and allows a smaller set of solutions than GR does for this case. There are indications that its solution space can be fully characterized and endowed with a measure. These architectonic features suggest that SD can explain the arrows of time as direct consequences of the law of the universe. They do not require special initial conditions. I will discuss these and other major issues on which SD may cast light.
Typicality of Universes and Discussion
Julian Barbour
University of Oxford
Shape Dynamics  1

Matteo Giuseppe Lostaglio Imperial College London

Tim Koslowski Universidad Nacional Autónoma De Mexico (UNAM)

Julian Barbour University of Oxford

Karim Thebault LudwigMaximiliansUniversitiät München (LMU)

Flavio Mercati University of Naples Federico II
Does Time Exist?
Julian Barbour
University of Oxford
Shape Dynamics and General Relativity
Julian Barbour
University of Oxford
Shape Dynamics first arose as a theory of particle interactions formulated without any of Newton's absolute structures. Its fundamental arena is shape space, which is obtained by quotienting Newton's kinematic framework with respect to translations, rotations and dilatations. This leads to a universe defined purely intrinsically in relational terms. It is then postulated that a dynamical history is determined by the specification in shape space of an initial shape and an associated rate of change of shape. There is a very natural way to create a theory that meets such a requirement.
The case for geometry
Julian Barbour
University of Oxford
Was Spacetime a Glorious Historical Accident?
Julian Barbour
University of Oxford
Exactly half a century after Minkowski’s justly famous lecture, Dirac’s efforts to quantize gravity led him “to doubt how fundamental the fourdimensional requirement in physics is”. Dirac does not appear to have explored this doubt further, but I shall argue that it needs to be considered seriously. The fact is that Einstein and Minkowski fused space and time into a fourdimensional continuum but never directly posed the two most fundamental questions in dynamics: What is time? What is motion?
The Theory of Duration and Clocks
Julian Barbour
University of Oxford
In 1898, Poincaré identified two fundamental issues in the theory of time: 1)What is the basis for saying that a second today is the same as a second tomorrow? 2) How can one define simultaneity at spatially separated points? Poincaré outlined the solution to the first problem { which amounts to a theory of duration { in his 1898 paper, and in 1905 he and Einstein simultaneously solved the second problem.